Add Silicon Canals to your Google News feed. 
Last week, a male colleague rolled his eyes when I mentioned I’d spent my weekend binging a true crime series. “Why are women so obsessed with murder stories?” he asked, genuinely puzzled. “It’s kind of morbid, isn’t it?”
His reaction wasn’t unusual. I’ve heard this sentiment countless times—the assumption that women’s fascination with true crime stems from some dark curiosity or macabre entertainment preference. But after diving into the psychology behind this phenomenon, I’ve discovered something far more profound: what looks like entertainment is actually education. What appears to be morbid fascination is really pattern recognition. And what seems like passive consumption? It’s active threat assessment.
The numbers tell a story we can’t ignore
The statistics are striking. According to Sarah Naseer and Christopher St. Aubin, researchers at Pew Research Center, “Women are almost twice as likely as men to regularly listen to true crime podcasts (44% vs. 23%).”
This isn’t just a slight preference—it’s an overwhelming trend. The Edison Research Report found that “Women are predominantly the consumers of digital true crime podcasts, in 2019 making up around 73% of the content audience.”
When I first saw these numbers, they reminded me of something I’d noticed during my years of interviewing people for articles. Women consistently brought up safety concerns in ways men rarely did. They’d mention checking parking garage corners, sharing location data with friends before dates, or keeping keys between their fingers while walking alone. The true crime obsession suddenly made perfect sense—it wasn’t obsession at all. It was preparation.
Learning the patterns before they become personal
Here’s what really clicked for me: women aren’t drawn to these stories because they enjoy them. They’re drawn to them because they need them.
As Nancy Jo Sales, author and journalist, points out: “Women who date in the digital age have become online detectives to keep true crimes from happening to them.”
Think about that for a moment. In an era where we meet strangers from apps, work late in empty offices, and navigate public spaces alone, these podcasts serve as informal training manuals. They’re teaching us what red flags look like before they become emergencies.
Michael Boudet, host of the true crime podcast ‘Sword and Scale’, explains it perfectly: “Women analyze true crime cases to spot red flags in relationships. They learn how jealous boyfriends escalate to violence.”
This isn’t entertainment—it’s education disguised as storytelling.
When anxiety becomes armor
I’ve dealt with anxiety since my early twenties, and I used to think my true crime consumption was making it worse. But research suggests something counterintuitive is happening.
Perchtold-Stefan et al., researchers studying this phenomenon, found that “Women tend to lean into true crime to help them regulate their emotions and make them feel safe in an unpredictable world.”
It sounds paradoxical, doesn’t it? How can stories about violence make us feel safer? But it’s the same principle behind why pilots train in flight simulators or why we run fire drills. By mentally rehearsing dangerous scenarios from the safety of our couches, we’re building psychological blueprints for survival.
The controlled exposure to fear through these podcasts allows us to process anxiety in manageable doses. We’re not wallowing in darkness; we’re illuminating it.
The uncomfortable truth about who’s at risk
Here’s the part that makes my male colleagues uncomfortable when I bring it up: the gender breakdown of true crime audiences mirrors the gender breakdown of victims in these crimes.
Dr. Amy Shlosberg, co-host of ‘Women & Crime’ podcast, shares that “Our audience is overwhelmingly female, over 90% of our listeners are female, and typically between the ages of 25 to 45.”
That age range isn’t random. It corresponds directly with the demographic most likely to experience intimate partner violence, stalking, and sexual assault. We’re not choosing these stories because we find them thrilling. We’re choosing them because they could be our stories.
When I listen to a podcast about warning signs of controlling behavior, I’m not being entertained—I’m being educated. When I hear about how a woman’s concerns were dismissed by authorities, I’m learning how to advocate for myself more effectively. When I discover how predators select their victims, I’m adjusting my own behavior to become a harder target.
From passive consumption to active protection
What fascinates me most is how this consumption has evolved into collective protection. Women don’t just listen to these podcasts in isolation—we discuss them, share them, and use them as teaching tools.
Monica Vilhauer Ph.D., a psychologist studying this trend, notes that “True crime media has evolved from a niche curiosity to a mainstream obsession, particularly among women.”
But calling it an “obsession” misses the point. It’s more like a grassroots education movement. We’re crowdsourcing safety information, building informal networks of knowledge that traditional safety education often fails to provide.
I’ve watched this happen in real-time. Friends share episodes that highlight specific red flags they’ve encountered. Online communities dissect cases to identify patterns. Group chats become impromptu safety seminars where we swap strategies and validate each other’s instincts.
Reframing the narrative
Perhaps it’s time we stopped apologizing for our interest in true crime. We’re not being morbid—we’re being practical. We’re not seeking thrills—we’re seeking knowledge.
Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark, podcast hosts, acknowledge that “Women are far from immune to the charms of a true-crime yarn.” But those “charms” aren’t what outsiders think they are. The appeal isn’t in the violence—it’s in the revelation of patterns, the validation of instincts, and the demystification of danger.
Every episode we listen to adds another tool to our mental toolkit. Every case we analyze sharpens our threat assessment skills. Every story we share potentially saves someone from becoming a story themselves.
Final thoughts
The next time someone questions why women dominate true crime audiences, I’ll tell them this: we’re not fascinated by death—we’re invested in survival. We’re not glorifying violence—we’re studying it to avoid becoming its victims.
This isn’t about paranoia or morbid curiosity. It’s about recognizing that in a world where women face disproportionate risks, knowledge truly is power. These podcasts aren’t feeding our fears; they’re arming us against them. And until the statistics change—until women aren’t the primary targets of the crimes these shows describe—we’ll keep listening, learning, and looking out for each other.
Because sometimes, the difference between a close call and a tragedy is recognizing the pattern before it’s too late.
From the editors
Undercurrent — our weekly newsletter. The sharpest writing from Silicon Canals, curated reads from across the web, and an editorial connecting what others cover in isolation. Every Sunday.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
