While Americans were thrilled when the summer season began in late June, a slew of severe storms has likely dampened the mood for many in recent weeks.
And the timing couldn’t have been worse. As Americans gathered to celebrate the country’s 250th birthday on July 4, hundreds of thousands reportedly celebrated without power (1) due to the combination of severe storms and a deadly heat wave (2).
Must Read
In Colorado, a storm littered a highway with significant hail (3) just a few days before the celebrations began, which came just weeks after another storm with hail the size of grapefruits (4) damaged many homes and vehicles in the area.
While extreme weather events such as this are enough to spoil any celebration, the damage these storms can leave behind is of much greater concern for homeowners. Hail, for example, can lead to damaged roofs, broken windows and dents in the gutters and siding of a home.
As homeowners in Colorado assess the recent damage to their homes, those who discover extensive damage to their roofs could have a tough decision to make: file a claim with their insurance provider, which could trigger a 7% to 10% premium increase (5), or cover the cost of repairs or replacement themselves.
How a federal rule change shifts roof costs onto homeowners
As MarketWatch reports, the Federal Housing Finance Agency revealed in March (6) that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, two government-sponsored enterprises that help to stabilize the U.S. housing market, will now permit home insurance policies to only provide actual cash value (5) (ACV) coverage for damaged roofs.
With this kind of policy, an insurer only has to cover the depreciated value of roof repairs or replacement rather than footing the entire bill, which would leave the homeowner to cover the rest of the cost out of pocket.
“For example, if hail damages your roof and it costs $10,000 to replace it, a replacement-cost value policy would pay out $10,000 minus a deductible,” MarketWatch reports. “But if you have an ACV policy, the insurer will consider the age and condition of the roof before determining a payout. So if the insurer determines the roof is worth $2,000, the remaining $8,000 falls on the homeowner.”
Story Continues
The Trump administration reportedly touted this rule change as a win for affordability, adding that it could help with lowering insurance premiums for Americans. And while that’s true — ACV premiums can be anywhere from 10% to 20% cheaper than replacement-cost value premiums — the costs that homeowners will have to pay out of pocket for a damaged roof could wipe out those potential savings.
With this in mind, housing experts such as Lindsay Frangie, a branch partner at Alcova Mortgage, are speaking out about whether this new rule will actually make homeownership more affordable.
“I think it’s a Band-Aid on a bullet wound,” Frangie told MarketWatch (5), adding that if a policyholder is “not prepared and they get a hailstorm or tornado, they are going to be in for the surprise of their life when they get that bill from the roofer saying, ‘Hey, your insurance is only covering $9,000, you owe another $9,000 to put a new roof on.'”
Making matters even worse is that many policyholders likely aren’t even aware that they have an ACV policy. As Amy Bach, director of United Policyholders, explained to MarketWatch, some insurance agents tend to “brush off the details” when selling policies.
“The amount of commission [agents] would earn by recommending more coverage is not worth it to them against the risk of them losing you as a customer because of the price point,” said Bach.
Read More: 7 essential money moves to make once you’ve saved $10,000
What homeowners with damaged roofs should do
The federal government’s rule change can put homeowners in a bind, which is why it’s important for policyholders with damaged roofs to thoroughly investigate the scope of the damage.
Depending on the materials and the size of the roof, the cost of a replacement can range anywhere from $5,000 to $30,000, MarketWatch says. Before filing an insurance claim, it’s best to carefully weigh the potential payout against the deductible, as well as the long-term impact on your insurance history.
Insurance providers factor in a policyholder’s overall claims history when pricing policies, which means homeowners would be wise to consider the impact of filing an insurance claim before doing so.
“Multiple claims over a relatively short period may affect future premiums or insurability, depending on the insurer and state regulations,” Loretta Worters, VP of media relations for the Insurance Information Institute, told MarketWatch (5). “If there is any question about the extent of the damage — particularly after a hailstorm — or if repairs are likely to exceed the deductible, policyholders should report the loss promptly and allow the insurer to inspect the property.”
For policyholders who are unsure about whether to file a claim, experts still suggest documenting the damage with date and time-stamped photos and videos. That way you’ll have what you need to prove the extent of the damage if and when you decide to file a claim with your insurance provider.
“For hail claims specifically, I often tell homeowners there is a difference between not reporting damage and not investigating damage,” Jennifer Taylor, CEO of Claim Ready, told MarketWatch. “After a major storm, it is generally wise to determine whether damage exists and understand the scope of the loss before deciding whether filing a claim makes financial sense.”
You May Also Like
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.
CBS News (1); The Guardian (2); Yahoo (3), (4); MarketWatch (5); Federal Housing Finance Agency (6)
This article originally appeared on Moneywise.com under the title: New federal home insurance rule could leave you paying thousands out of pocket for a damaged roof
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
