That $67 Flight Might Cost More Than You Think

Robert Grunnah thought he’d scored a deal when he found a round-trip flight from Austin, Texas, to Denver for just $67. But as he sat on a delayed plane, watching an overworked agent juggle an overbooked flight, he wondered: Was his flight too cheap?

“Something is seriously wrong with that business model,” said Grunnah, a real estate investor from Austin. “The flight was three hours behind schedule, the gate agent was weary and frazzled, and the plane was fully booked to the point of discomfort. That $67 ticket informed me that the airline was selling seats to fill planes and slashing staff and services to dangerous levels.”

Check out Elliott Confidential, the newsletter the travel industry doesn’t want you to read. Each issue is filled with breaking news, deep insights, and exclusive strategies for becoming a better traveler. But don’t tell anyone!

Welcome to the dark side of travel’s race to the bottom, where deep discounts come with hidden costs that degrade your experience and harm communities, workers, and the environment.

It’s a complex issue that calls into question company practices, government policy and the decisions you make as a traveler. But it all kinda makes you wonder if you’re not paying enough for your trip.

The human toll of bargain travel

While conventional wisdom suggests travel is becoming too expensive – and yes, I’ve written about that subject – a growing chorus of industry insiders argues the opposite: Travel has become dangerously cheap in some cases, and someone else is always paying the real price.

Alexandra Dubakova, the chief marketing officer for a tour operator based in Zürich, Switzerland, recently visited Egypt where she saw it firsthand.

“Cheap prices equal cheap lives,” she explained. “In hotels, in restaurants, in tourist traps, everyone I encountered seemed exhausted and beleaguered. But the moment they made eye contact with a foreigner, their transformation was instantaneous. The smiles flipped on and off like light switches.”

The numbers behind Egypt’s tourism industry tell the story: workers earning wages so low that they resort to begging. Dubakova recalled the most troubling example. In a public restroom, a desperate man stole all the toilet paper and then stood at the door and resold it to tourists.

“It was disturbing,” she said.

Cord Thomas, president of a vacation rental management company in Broomfield, Colorado, has observed this dynamic across the hospitality industry.

“The number of housekeepers cleaning 20 rooms per shift maintains low hotel prices while famous tourist spots transform into overpopulated souvenir images,” he said. “Travelers who save money usually fail to notice the employee exhaustion and environmental damage that result from their bookings.”

Environmental and cultural destruction

The environmental cost of ultra-cheap travel extends far beyond carbon emissions – and leisure travel.

“Frequent fliers are responsible for the bulk of aviation emissions,” said Rebecca Thompson, founding CEO of Sustainable Travel Technologies.

Ultra-cheap prices are difficult to square with the sustainability narrative many travel companies have tried to weave.

On the one hand, they deeply discount their fares and rates; on the other, they claim they are being environmentally responsible by using small amounts of sustainable aviation fuel, or by building solar farms, recycling, or growing vegetables behind their hotel. I’ve been covering sustainability for years, and I hear this type of doublespeak far too often.

Cultural heritage pays an equally steep price. Frank Marr, a spokesman for Nueva Vista, a destination-management company operating in Armenia’s Caucasus Mountains, has watched discount tourism hollow out authentic experiences.

“Full-day excursions can drop below $25, pushing guides under the local living wage,” he said. “Discount crowds flood Instagram-famous areas like Tbilisi’s Old Town, while quieter UNESCO treasures – Sheki’s Khan Palace in Azerbaijan or the Akhtala Monastery in Armenia – struggle for conservation funds.”

What to do about the race to the bottom

Travel industry experts increasingly recognize that the obsession with low prices is unsustainable.

“Low prices tend to hurt any industry when players attempt to differentiate themselves on the price front,” explained Denish Shah, a marketing professor at Georgia State University. “Airlines have tried to achieve economies of scale by shrinking legroom space and reducing the quantity and quality of in-flight meals. All of this has come at the expense of service quality and consumer experience.”

The reality of “cheap” travel often proves to be costlier than the advertisement.

“Hidden fees can erode trust and create legal and regulatory challenges for airlines and travel companies,” added Eric Napoli, AirHelp’s chief legal officer.”

The too-low prices may also affect safety, according to Bill McGee, a senior fellow at the American Economic Liberties Project. His research reveals that airlines cut costs in critical areas to prop up the dirt-cheap prices.

“A mechanic told me that the $99 ticket came with a price,” he said. “And the savings came from outsourcing heavy aircraft maintenance to El Salvador, China, and Singapore – far away from the watchful eyes of the Federal Aviation Administration.”

So what’s the solution?

The path forward requires fundamental changes in how companies price travel products and how we perceive the value of those products.

Napoli of AirHelp said one solution is better pricing disclosure.

“Airlines and travel companies should be transparent from the start, especially as passengers select different bag options or services and fees start piling on,” he said.

Rebecca Thompson of Sustainable Travel Technologies thinks better government policy could address the problem.

“A tax has been proposed on frequent flyers, where travelers pay more as they take more flights,” she said. “This could see those polluting the most paying for the impact they’re having on the environment, while still keeping it affordable for the majority to take their once-a-year trip.”

John William, a travel advisor at Easy Travel and Tour, said prices should reflect the accurate cost of delivering the service. Also, many people are willing to pay for a product that benefits the community.

“I think travelers are more ready to pay a reasonable price, provided they realize how it helps sustainable communities, fair treatment of labor, and conservation,” he said.

Of course, the solution ultimately rests with travelers.

“People should avoid taking short weekend breaks because of inexpensive flight prices,” said Thomas, the vacation rental expert. “Spend your money on fewer meaningful trips, which will benefit the local community.”

You get what you pay for

Grunnah’s cheap flight wasn’t his only brush with unsustainable pricing. He also paid $45 per night for a room in a hotel that should have cost $180 a night. The experience haunted him long after checkout.

“One individual was handling the front desk, checking in guests, answering the phone, and receiving maintenance calls, all simultaneously,” he recalls. “The housekeeping staff was cleaning rooms so fast that overall cleanliness was compromised, and the breakfast bar was out of food by 8 a.m. because management cut corners wherever possible. I felt bad paying so little because I could see the human cost of my low rate.”

That guilt represents a growing awareness among travelers that bargain prices extract value from places they claim to celebrate. Ultra-cheap travel doesn’t democratize experiences. It degrades them, turning destinations into theme parks and workers into props in someone else’s Instagram story.

Bottom line: Maybe we can’t afford these cheap prices.

Christopher Elliott is an author, consumer advocate, and journalist. He founded Elliott Advocacy, a nonprofit organization that helps solve consumer problems. He publishes Elliott Confidential, a travel newsletter, and the Elliott Report, a news site about customer service. If you need help with a consumer problem, you can reach him here or email him at [email protected].

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: That $67 flight might cost more than you think

Reporting by Christopher Elliott, Special to USA TODAY / USA TODAY

USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect